Ernesto Blume criticized the tax investigation against Dina Baluarte for allegedly resigning: “There was haste”

Ernest Blumeformer chairman of the Constitutional Court (TC), considered that there was “hasty” on the part of the Prosecutor General’s Office in opening a preliminary investigation against the president. In Bolwart for allegedly leaving office, for not informing the Council of Ministers or Congress of the surgical procedure he underwent in 2023.

In the same vein, he rejected constitutional complaint Congresswoman Margo Palacios “with complete ease” brought against the head of state an alleged violation of the Constitution due to his absence from office and the creation of a power vacuum.

“There was, and it must be said frankly, a rush on the part of the Prosecutor General. It is interesting that the news comes out between December 4 and 5 (December), and on the same 5th, a constitutional charge is brought completely frivolously, allegedly a criminal act, when there is no constitutional or legal duty to answer for an intervention of this nature,” he said. Expanding news.

“I see us drowning in a glass of water and creating a storm where there is none and, from my point of view, stepping on the heels of certain sectors that want to destabilize the government,” he said.

In this sense, the ex-head of the TC emphasized that “there is no constitutional duty of the president to give a report on the performed medical interventions.”

“Holding the president to account for a rhinoplasty procedure that involved local rather than general anesthesia is an exaggeration, especially when there is clear evidence that she issued 91 provisions between laws, emergency decrees, executive orders and executive orders” , – he noted.

Should presidents be required to report medical interventions?

Ernest Blume was not against the duty of the heads of state to report on medical interventions to which they obey “if you want to have more zeal for presidential actions.”

“It might be a good initiative to establish the provision that in some cases (the president) should be responsible,” he commented.

“I agree on the issue of transparency, but we have to polish as we go any situation that may have arisen; But let’s no longer turn the president into a kind of scapegoat or piñata that we beat for a whole week and then ask the public what they think,” he said.

As I reminded, Art National Prosecutor’s Office launched a preliminary investigation against President Dina Baluarte for failing to inform the Council of Ministers or Congress about a surgical procedure she underwent in 2023.

Digital journalist with more than 15 years of experience. I write about a variety of topics: politics, policing, international affairs, technology, video games, heavy metal \m/. Movie buff, series lover, collector, gamer.

Check Also

Gustavo Adriansen assures that the death penalty for rapists is not yet the policy of Dina Baluarte’s government

Peru now legal to use the death penalty, but with restrictions – By Infobae Perú …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *