Luis Llamas Puccio believes that Dina Baluarte is “criminally responsible” if she did not comply with the notice during the operation

Jorge Luis Pineda Barrera

The Prosecutor's Office has opened a preliminary investigation into Dina Baluarte for allegedly leaving her post

The prosecutor’s office opened a preliminary investigation against Dina Baluarte for allegedly leaving her post Source: RPP

Criminal lawyer, Luis Lamas Puccioshowed that there are sufficient elements to establish the alleged crimes of “inaction” and “refusal of office” that the President of the Republic, Dina Baluarte, committed after the operation of the nose in 2023, and for which it will be condemned. preliminary investigation by the prosecutor’s office.

“Here we are talking about a functional task that is the most important in the country, which is the president, and when a function of this level is performed, it is performed 24 hours a day, and when in such an environment of “formality”, in addition to the fact that this the information would have been hidden, I believe that the minimum conditions have been met to be able to talk about functional criminal responsibility,” the lawyer said in the program. Things as they are with RPP.

He also noted that this investigation strengthens the constitutional complaint that the congresswoman presented the day before Margot Palacios for allegedly violation of the constitution committed by the head of state in this case.

“The fact that an investigation has been launched strengthens this constitutional complaint to some extent, because obviously the investigation is another contribution in terms of the requirements to be able to remove Ms. Boluarte from the presidency,” he said.

Llamas Puccio also argued that the constitution was violated because the presidential powers were interrupted when it was a staff function.

On the other hand, he stated that the surgical intervention of Art In Baluart”was not common knowledge” and that they were “circumstances that reveal this distortion of what it means to withhold information”.

Presidential vacancy

Considering these facts, Art criminal lawyer believes that there are “legal and factual” conditions for a presidential vacancy because “public opinion would be lied to”.

“What really determines the course of the analysis of events are two facts. Firstly, it was a frivolous intervention without any justification, and secondly, that the information was withheld to misinform and try by all possible means to ensure that the absence of the President was not known or had the necessary significance, this is also a fact that needs to be assessed “, he said.

the chairman “You cannot be absent even for a few seconds or minutes from functional exercises, and if any event occurs, you must follow the mandates and protocols provided by law for events of this nature,” he concluded.

Check Also

Gustavo Adriansen assures that the death penalty for rapists is not yet the policy of Dina Baluarte’s government

Peru now legal to use the death penalty, but with restrictions – By Infobae Perú …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *