Jobs and Employment Information about jobs, labors, experiencies and news Related Articles
The PSOE suddenly took a decisive step to stop the popular accusation, which is known to this day, and at the same time to prevent judges from expressing their opinion on political issues and then judging a case that affects the match. . The Socialists, as Patsy Lopez explained in a hasty press conference televised to Congress – announced on a Friday in January, without parliamentary business, the first morning, in just forty minutes – justify the initiative by the need to end the alleged “persecution” that they exposed, and root out “interested leaks” that he says are linked to ulterior motives.
The spokesman for the Socialist Parliamentary Group registered the bill at ten in the morning, according to the PSOE, to address “persecution resulting from abusive legal actions”, and a few minutes later he was explaining it to several media present at the time. in the lower house. In his presentation, López based the initiative on four directions: the reformulation of the popular accusation – the figure who initiated the cases involving the wife and brother of the president Begoña Gómez and David Sánchez – the ban on filing complaints based solely on press clippings, the suppression of crimes of religious crimes and duty abstention or the subsequent disqualification of judges who have made “political comments” before cases that they are investigating.
The bill, announced out of the blue in the middle of a non-working month, comes as the government and Sanchez’s entourage face several court cases stemming from popular accusations that have been heavily reported in the media. In particular, the PSOE proposes in its initiative that the presence of popular accusations be limited to the presentation of the complaint and the oral phase of the trial, but that they cannot participate in the investigation in order to avoid “interested leaks”. In addition, there must be a “specific connection” to the case for the association to be a popular charge, and political parties and associated organizations will be prohibited from using the figure.
In addition, reproducing the socialist argument since the investigation of Sánchez’s wife, Begoña Gómez, began on the complaint of Manos Limpes, the PSOE claims that they cannot be processed if they are based only on “press clippings”. What they came to call “pseudo-media”. As for the judges, the aspect in which López was most ambiguous because of the general nature of the term “political commentary”, the Socialist spokesman missed a certain flavor of “entitlement” – allegedly a judicial war with political goals – and continued the president’s controversial words at the Christmas Cup, which took place with journalists at the Moncloa Palace in December.
Sánchez, in informal conversations with media editors, accused Alberto Núñez Feijoa of “playing marked cards” in the courts, as if there was cooperation between the PP and the judges. “There are sectors that encourage judges and magistrates to politically identify themselves, to be able to initiate processes where they have an advantage,” López said this Friday, almost a month after that phrase, clearly moving along the same lines.
Ultras
And finally, with regard to the suppression of the crime of insulting religious feelings, a topic that gained momentum last New Year’s Eve, when the actress Lalahus showed to the beat of chimes on Spanish television a religious image that, instead of the face of Jesus Christ had the head of a Grand Prix heifer, – defended Lopez: “The last victim is Lalah.” Ultras are violating our basic rights. The right to freedom of expression.
The representative of the Socialists admitted that he almost did not contact the partners to inform about the presentation of the initiative, because in January – a non-working day – there was no opportunity to make more serious contacts to try to get their support. Both the parties to the left of the PSOE and the pro-independence parties have long embraced the “legality” theory, so in principle it seems likely that the law will eventually pass and that even the government’s allies will be asking for it to be passed further on some questions. It is not for nothing that Juntes continues to accuse the judiciary of “trickery” for not granting amnesty to Carles Puigdemont when the Supreme Court found that misappropriation of “process” had no place in the law passed by Congress.
